<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Your Wellington—interact with mayoral candidate Jack Yan</title>
	<atom:link href="http://yourwellington.org/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://yourwellington.org</link>
	<description>Building the city you want</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 06 Jan 2010 02:35:50 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on Solar power in the city by Eli Weir</title>
		<link>http://yourwellington.org/2009/08/solar-power-in-the-city/comment-page-1/#comment-497</link>
		<dc:creator>Eli Weir</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Jan 2010 02:35:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://yourwellington.org/?p=63#comment-497</guid>
		<description>How about rooftop gardens in the CBD that help lower ambient temperature (caused by all that concrete and glass), balance carbon emissions, circulate air, and soak up solar energy (via embedded systems and the plant-life)?

A program of retrofitting large-scale office buildings would do wonders for the lifestyle of those that use them, as well as ensuring a lower power-consumption (and potential to return energy to the grid via those solar cells).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How about rooftop gardens in the CBD that help lower ambient temperature (caused by all that concrete and glass), balance carbon emissions, circulate air, and soak up solar energy (via embedded systems and the plant-life)?</p>
<p>A program of retrofitting large-scale office buildings would do wonders for the lifestyle of those that use them, as well as ensuring a lower power-consumption (and potential to return energy to the grid via those solar cells).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Why I set up this site by Eli Weir</title>
		<link>http://yourwellington.org/2009/07/why-i-set-up-this-site/comment-page-1/#comment-496</link>
		<dc:creator>Eli Weir</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Jan 2010 02:29:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://yourwellington.org/?p=31#comment-496</guid>
		<description>Some things that could be done very quickly to encourage and grow business:

1. Setup a local Cloud Computing platform, as a public/private sector partnership, thereby lowering a barrier to entry and reducing operational costs - whilst allaying security, privacy, data sovereignty and latency concerns.

2. Create an similarly architected network of physical space, offering on-demand and scalable offices. Ensure these are of an &quot;open-standard&quot; that includes high levels of comfort and environmental concern, designed around people and teams to facilitate productivity. Easy plug-ins to the cloud, city network, transport, etc.

3. Encourage the routing of traffic in the most effective way - which would include a high density of pedestrian, public, and self-powered or electric transport in the inner-city - and introduce appropriate gateways and switches to step commercial and other up and down the interface.

4. Discourage the creation of &quot;homogeneous zones&quot; within the city, and instead encourage creation of heterogeneous zones where retail, commercial, residential and public services are mixed and layered to create effective local markets for goods and services (for as much of the 24 hrs in a day as possible).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Some things that could be done very quickly to encourage and grow business:</p>
<p>1. Setup a local Cloud Computing platform, as a public/private sector partnership, thereby lowering a barrier to entry and reducing operational costs &#8211; whilst allaying security, privacy, data sovereignty and latency concerns.</p>
<p>2. Create an similarly architected network of physical space, offering on-demand and scalable offices. Ensure these are of an &#8220;open-standard&#8221; that includes high levels of comfort and environmental concern, designed around people and teams to facilitate productivity. Easy plug-ins to the cloud, city network, transport, etc.</p>
<p>3. Encourage the routing of traffic in the most effective way &#8211; which would include a high density of pedestrian, public, and self-powered or electric transport in the inner-city &#8211; and introduce appropriate gateways and switches to step commercial and other up and down the interface.</p>
<p>4. Discourage the creation of &#8220;homogeneous zones&#8221; within the city, and instead encourage creation of heterogeneous zones where retail, commercial, residential and public services are mixed and layered to create effective local markets for goods and services (for as much of the 24 hrs in a day as possible).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The 2010 mayoral election is about job creation and transparency by Eli Weir</title>
		<link>http://yourwellington.org/2010/01/the-2010-mayoral-election-is-about-job-creation-and-transparency/comment-page-1/#comment-495</link>
		<dc:creator>Eli Weir</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Jan 2010 02:15:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://yourwellington.org/?p=150#comment-495</guid>
		<description>We can&#039;t have the same type of people doing the same type of thing. We need the city to have technology and business-savvy leaders who understand the new paradigms facing us - with their inherent opportunities and obstacles. 

If we want to have a different result, we need to take different action ...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We can&#8217;t have the same type of people doing the same type of thing. We need the city to have technology and business-savvy leaders who understand the new paradigms facing us &#8211; with their inherent opportunities and obstacles. </p>
<p>If we want to have a different result, we need to take different action &#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Wake-up calls from Global Entrepreneurship Week by Eli Weir</title>
		<link>http://yourwellington.org/2009/12/wake-up-calls-from-global-entrepreneurship-week/comment-page-1/#comment-494</link>
		<dc:creator>Eli Weir</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Jan 2010 02:08:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://yourwellington.org/?p=140#comment-494</guid>
		<description>Recent success in the UK has shown that local government can have a huge impact on the economy, via the way they act and interact. The more agile, accessible and innovative the council, the higher the level of successful innovation in the business community. If we want more of the success alluded to above, we need to ensure that we have actively cultured it.

An unpredictable economic climate coupled with shifting patterns of demand and growing pressure on public services, mean that the council is going to need to play a pro-active role in achieving signiﬁcantly better outcomes, for signiﬁcantly lower costs. One response to this dual challenge of better outcomes and lower costs would be to retrench and focus on ever greater efﬁciencies in the quest to make the ﬁgures add up and to ensure that limited resources can go further. Of course, efﬁciency and productivity are both deeply important issues. But in themselves, they will not be sufﬁcient to meet the changing and increasingly complex issues that government is now expected to tackle.

If the pressure on budgets is growing, so too is the pressure on local government to tackle a wider range of issues than ever before: where current policies are not working well enough, or where new issues are emerging that have not been on the agenda in the past. All of these problems share one characteristic: they are deﬁned by an uncertainty about what works. In other words, there is no best practice that exists and can simply be shared – instead the local government sector needs to develop next practice: it will need to innovate in order to achieve better outcomes.

An increasing number of organisations are recognising that slicing existing budgets ever more thinly is not enough in today’s world, and that competition and outsourcing alone will not do the trick. An altogether bolder approach is needed, focused on searching out, incubating, and sustaining much more radical and game-changing innovations. This shift in mindset can be illustrated by imagining the difference in tactics one might use depending on whether you were told to shave 2 per cent of your budget every year for 10 years, or to strike 25 per cent of your budget off the balance sheet in a single year. In the second scenario, your options necessarily become more radical. And, given the nature of the problems public services are now facing, this second mindset is the one that we need to adopt when it comes to issues such as climate change, social care or public health - or how to stimulate the local economy.

Does our local government have the right attitude and skills for the difﬁcult times ahead? There are a well-documented set of barriers within local government and other parts of the public sector. These include: a pressure for compliance and risk avoidance, rather than innovation and risk management; a poor connection between insights from the front-line and policy work; a difﬁculty in ﬁnding ways to ‘export’ innovations from local contexts. Many senior staff note the need for a new kind of leadership to stimulate innovation - acknowledging that too often, innovations have the feel of a ‘happy accident’, driven by entrepreneurial individuals who don’t take no as an answer.

I would suggest that the best way forward is to change the way in which we view the part of various players in the game, that we now have the appropriate technology, methods of communication and social structures to allow a far greater level of engagement and participation from the business community and other constituents. Entrepreneurship and innovation should be cultivated at all levels and by all players.

There are three distinctive but equally important roles that local government can and should be playing when it comes to innovation:

   1. Local government as the driver of local innovation. By creating Innovation Clusters and partnering with the private sector, the council can create a step change in the pace at which the city-region can adapt to changing circumstances, new ideas and fresh opportunities.
   2. Local government as an incubator for testing, developing and improving new approaches to public service provision.
   3. Local government as a constructive disruptor - taking an active role in not just reacting to events, but predicting or causing them

One of the secrets to success is having the ability to easily communicate and collaborate across the public and private sectors - from schools through to service providers, government agencies and enterprises. The application of social media and networking technology within the council and other organisations, and out across the city, will help (the &quot;Enterprise 2.0&quot; phenomenon). A city of creative, innovative people who are always connected (via the free city-wide network - WiFi or otherwise), who can access information and each other on-demand? Unstoppable ...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Recent success in the UK has shown that local government can have a huge impact on the economy, via the way they act and interact. The more agile, accessible and innovative the council, the higher the level of successful innovation in the business community. If we want more of the success alluded to above, we need to ensure that we have actively cultured it.</p>
<p>An unpredictable economic climate coupled with shifting patterns of demand and growing pressure on public services, mean that the council is going to need to play a pro-active role in achieving signiﬁcantly better outcomes, for signiﬁcantly lower costs. One response to this dual challenge of better outcomes and lower costs would be to retrench and focus on ever greater efﬁciencies in the quest to make the ﬁgures add up and to ensure that limited resources can go further. Of course, efﬁciency and productivity are both deeply important issues. But in themselves, they will not be sufﬁcient to meet the changing and increasingly complex issues that government is now expected to tackle.</p>
<p>If the pressure on budgets is growing, so too is the pressure on local government to tackle a wider range of issues than ever before: where current policies are not working well enough, or where new issues are emerging that have not been on the agenda in the past. All of these problems share one characteristic: they are deﬁned by an uncertainty about what works. In other words, there is no best practice that exists and can simply be shared – instead the local government sector needs to develop next practice: it will need to innovate in order to achieve better outcomes.</p>
<p>An increasing number of organisations are recognising that slicing existing budgets ever more thinly is not enough in today’s world, and that competition and outsourcing alone will not do the trick. An altogether bolder approach is needed, focused on searching out, incubating, and sustaining much more radical and game-changing innovations. This shift in mindset can be illustrated by imagining the difference in tactics one might use depending on whether you were told to shave 2 per cent of your budget every year for 10 years, or to strike 25 per cent of your budget off the balance sheet in a single year. In the second scenario, your options necessarily become more radical. And, given the nature of the problems public services are now facing, this second mindset is the one that we need to adopt when it comes to issues such as climate change, social care or public health &#8211; or how to stimulate the local economy.</p>
<p>Does our local government have the right attitude and skills for the difﬁcult times ahead? There are a well-documented set of barriers within local government and other parts of the public sector. These include: a pressure for compliance and risk avoidance, rather than innovation and risk management; a poor connection between insights from the front-line and policy work; a difﬁculty in ﬁnding ways to ‘export’ innovations from local contexts. Many senior staff note the need for a new kind of leadership to stimulate innovation &#8211; acknowledging that too often, innovations have the feel of a ‘happy accident’, driven by entrepreneurial individuals who don’t take no as an answer.</p>
<p>I would suggest that the best way forward is to change the way in which we view the part of various players in the game, that we now have the appropriate technology, methods of communication and social structures to allow a far greater level of engagement and participation from the business community and other constituents. Entrepreneurship and innovation should be cultivated at all levels and by all players.</p>
<p>There are three distinctive but equally important roles that local government can and should be playing when it comes to innovation:</p>
<p>   1. Local government as the driver of local innovation. By creating Innovation Clusters and partnering with the private sector, the council can create a step change in the pace at which the city-region can adapt to changing circumstances, new ideas and fresh opportunities.<br />
   2. Local government as an incubator for testing, developing and improving new approaches to public service provision.<br />
   3. Local government as a constructive disruptor &#8211; taking an active role in not just reacting to events, but predicting or causing them</p>
<p>One of the secrets to success is having the ability to easily communicate and collaborate across the public and private sectors &#8211; from schools through to service providers, government agencies and enterprises. The application of social media and networking technology within the council and other organisations, and out across the city, will help (the &#8220;Enterprise 2.0&#8243; phenomenon). A city of creative, innovative people who are always connected (via the free city-wide network &#8211; WiFi or otherwise), who can access information and each other on-demand? Unstoppable &#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Wellington needs free wi&#64257;, and a tech strategy by Eli Weir</title>
		<link>http://yourwellington.org/2009/08/wellington-needs-free-wi-and-a-tech-strategy/comment-page-1/#comment-493</link>
		<dc:creator>Eli Weir</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Jan 2010 01:43:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://yourwellington.org/?p=56#comment-493</guid>
		<description>Free WiFi is an admirable goal, but one that should not detract from the more important point you raised, that Wellington needs to have an appropriate IT strategy, and the right people to implement it. In order to grow the local economy, the city needs to take a hard look at exactly what the infrastructure of the future needs to look like.

Our sustainable competitive advantages are creativity, agility, and innovation - and the unique characteristics of Wellington (and New Zealand). In order to nurture these qualities, we need to create the right environment; one with a flexible infrastructure of shared-services around computing power, network access, physical space, transportation &amp; logistics.

Combine this with Wellington&#039;s thriving arts &amp; culture establishment, and a focus on people and environmentally friendly development, and we have a city poised to compete internationally.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Free WiFi is an admirable goal, but one that should not detract from the more important point you raised, that Wellington needs to have an appropriate IT strategy, and the right people to implement it. In order to grow the local economy, the city needs to take a hard look at exactly what the infrastructure of the future needs to look like.</p>
<p>Our sustainable competitive advantages are creativity, agility, and innovation &#8211; and the unique characteristics of Wellington (and New Zealand). In order to nurture these qualities, we need to create the right environment; one with a flexible infrastructure of shared-services around computing power, network access, physical space, transportation &amp; logistics.</p>
<p>Combine this with Wellington&#8217;s thriving arts &amp; culture establishment, and a focus on people and environmentally friendly development, and we have a city poised to compete internationally.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The 2010 mayoral election is about job creation and transparency by Twitted by jackyan</title>
		<link>http://yourwellington.org/2010/01/the-2010-mayoral-election-is-about-job-creation-and-transparency/comment-page-1/#comment-471</link>
		<dc:creator>Twitted by jackyan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Jan 2010 03:49:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://yourwellington.org/?p=150#comment-471</guid>
		<description>[...] This post was Twitted by jackyan [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] This post was Twitted by jackyan [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Why Peter Jackson deserves a knighthood by Tweets that mention Why Peter Jackson deserves a knighthood &#124; Your Wellington -- Topsy.com</title>
		<link>http://yourwellington.org/2009/12/why-peter-jackson-deserves-a-knighthood/comment-page-1/#comment-462</link>
		<dc:creator>Tweets that mention Why Peter Jackson deserves a knighthood &#124; Your Wellington -- Topsy.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Dec 2009 00:23:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://yourwellington.org/?p=148#comment-462</guid>
		<description>[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Jack Yan 甄爵恩, Vanessa Ching. Vanessa Ching said: RT @jackyan: wrote: Why Peter Jackson deserves a knighthood http://bit.ly/4Irlyy #WellingtonMayor [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Jack Yan 甄爵恩, Vanessa Ching. Vanessa Ching said: RT @jackyan: wrote: Why Peter Jackson deserves a knighthood <a href="http://bit.ly/4Irlyy" rel="nofollow">http://bit.ly/4Irlyy</a> #WellingtonMayor [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Being sensible about pedestrianizing Wellington by Tweets that mention Being sensible about pedestrianizing Wellington &#124; Your Wellington -- Topsy.com</title>
		<link>http://yourwellington.org/2009/11/being-sensible-about-pedestrianizing-wellington/comment-page-1/#comment-303</link>
		<dc:creator>Tweets that mention Being sensible about pedestrianizing Wellington &#124; Your Wellington -- Topsy.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 05:44:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://yourwellington.org/?p=118#comment-303</guid>
		<description>[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Jack Yan 甄爵恩, Jaysen Magan. Jaysen Magan said: RT @jackyan: wrote: Being sensible about pedestrianizing Wellington http://bit.ly/4obxk8 (yourwellington.org) [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Jack Yan 甄爵恩, Jaysen Magan. Jaysen Magan said: RT @jackyan: wrote: Being sensible about pedestrianizing Wellington <a href="http://bit.ly/4obxk8" rel="nofollow">http://bit.ly/4obxk8</a> (yourwellington.org) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Manners Mall issue by Lucky Ngatuere</title>
		<link>http://yourwellington.org/2009/07/manners-mall-issue/comment-page-1/#comment-296</link>
		<dc:creator>Lucky Ngatuere</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 04:05:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://yourwellington.org/?p=1#comment-296</guid>
		<description>Why does a city strive to make more money from business? Who will benefit from the money that is made? How will they benefit?  Who are the people that the city is trying to attract?  What makes a city more attractive to people.  
Does the city council really believe that by opening up Manners Mall to buses it is going to relieve congestion in the city? Can somebody give me straight forward answers to these questions so that I am able to make an informed decision on this as a Wellingtonian.  Having lived in Wellington only 8 years I have seen many changes occur that supposedly were meant to relieve traffic congestion. The action of opening up Manners Mall again seems to suggest that the previous actions did not really work. I believe that people should come first and that the people in charge of the infrastructure should put people first then business and profits second. It&#039;s just my opinion. then with the business and profits people will benefit. I agree there should be balance. Do things that will benefit most. The malls in a city, in my opinion, make the city a community and noit just a concrete jungle where people go to work.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why does a city strive to make more money from business? Who will benefit from the money that is made? How will they benefit?  Who are the people that the city is trying to attract?  What makes a city more attractive to people.<br />
Does the city council really believe that by opening up Manners Mall to buses it is going to relieve congestion in the city? Can somebody give me straight forward answers to these questions so that I am able to make an informed decision on this as a Wellingtonian.  Having lived in Wellington only 8 years I have seen many changes occur that supposedly were meant to relieve traffic congestion. The action of opening up Manners Mall again seems to suggest that the previous actions did not really work. I believe that people should come first and that the people in charge of the infrastructure should put people first then business and profits second. It&#8217;s just my opinion. then with the business and profits people will benefit. I agree there should be balance. Do things that will benefit most. The malls in a city, in my opinion, make the city a community and noit just a concrete jungle where people go to work.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Why I set up this site by Jack Yan</title>
		<link>http://yourwellington.org/2009/07/why-i-set-up-this-site/comment-page-1/#comment-260</link>
		<dc:creator>Jack Yan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Nov 2009 01:04:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://yourwellington.org/?p=31#comment-260</guid>
		<description>Precisely, Mike—my thoughts exactly. We know it’s the best city in the world. Now let’s unleash its potential and put in the things that will make it so.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Precisely, Mike—my thoughts exactly. We know it’s the best city in the world. Now let’s unleash its potential and put in the things that will make it so.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
